Understanding
Futures Options
For additional information, please take
a look at our Options
FAQ.
Table of Contents:
- Option
Terms
- Why
Use Options
- Option
Valuation
INTRODUCTION
Options on futures contracts have added
a new dimension to futures trading. Like
futures, options provide price protection
against adverse price moves. Present-day
options trading on the floor of an exchange
began in April 1973 when the Chicago Board
of Trade created the Chicago Board Options
Exchange (CBOE) for the sole purpose of
trading options on a limited number of New
York Stock Exchange-listed equities. Options
on futures contracts were introduced at
the CBOT in October 1982 when the exchange
began trading Options on U.S. Treasury Bond
futures.
Reasons
for using Options
Options differ considerably from futures.
When used prudently, options can be of immense
importance, especially in attempting to
preserve the value of an existing fixed-income
portfolio.
To many in the financial markets, options
are considered "insurance" against adverse
price movements while offering the flexibility
to benefit from possible favorable price
movement.
The reasons for using options on futures
are reflected in the structure of an option
contract.
First, an option, when purchased, gives
the buyer the right, but not the obligation,
to buy or sell a specific amount of a specific
commodity at a specific price within a specific
period of time. By comparison, a futures
contract requires a buyer or seller
to perform under the terms of the contract
if an open position is not offset before
expiration.
Second, the decision to exercise the option
is entirely that of the buyer.
Third, the purchaser of the option can lose
no more than the initial amount of money
invested (premium). That is not the case,
however, for the buyer of a futures contract.
Finally, an option buyer is never subject
to margin calls. This enables the purchaser
to maintain a market position, despite any
adverse moves without putting up additional
funds.
Options
Terminology
There are several important terms the would-be
user of options on futures should understand.
They include:
- call
option:
- Gives
the buyer the right, but not the obligation,
to buy a specific futures contract at
a predetermined price within a limited
period of time.
- put
option:
- Gives
the buyer the right, but not the obligation,
to sell a specific futures contract at
a predetermined price within a limited
period of time.
- holder:
- The
buyer of the option.
- premium:
- The
dollar amount paid by the buyer of the
option to the seller.
- writer:
- The
option seller.
- strike
price:
-
The predetermined price at which a given
futures contract can be bought or sold.
Also called the exercise price,
these levels are set at regular intervals.
For example, if Treasury bond futures
were at 79-00, T-bond option strike prices
would be at 74, 76, 78, 80, 82, and 84.
- at-the-money:
- An
option is at-the-money when the underlying
futures price equals, or nearly equals,
the strike price. For example, a T-bond
put or call option is at-the-money if
the option strike price is 78 and the
price of the Treasury bond futures contract
is at, or near, 78-00.
- in-the-money:
-
A call option is in-the-money when the
underlying futures price is greater than
the strike price. For example, if Treasury
bond futures are at 80-00 and the T-bond
call option strike price is 78, the call
is in-the-money. The put option is in-the-money
when the strike price of the option is
greater then the price of the underlying
futures contract. For example, if the
strike price of the put option is 80 and
T-bond futures are trading at 77-00, the
put option is in-the-money.
- out-of-the-money:
-
A call option is out-of-the-money if the
strike price is greater than the underlying
futures price. For example, if T-bond
futures are at 80-00 and the T-bond call
option has an 82 strike price, the option
is out-of-the-money. The put option is
out-of-the-money if the underlying futures
price is greater then the strike price.
For example, if T-bond futures are at
77-00, and the T-bond put option strike
price is 76, the put option is out-of-the-money.
Call option Put option
In-the-money Futures > Strike Futures < Strike
At-the money Futures = Strike Futures = Strike
Out-of-the-money Futures < Strike Futures > Strike
Options are considered "wasting assets."
In other words, they have a limited life
because each expires on a certain day, although
it may be weeks, months, or years away.
The expiration date is the last day the
option can be exercised, otherwise it expires
worthless.
For every option buyer there is an option
seller. In other words, for every call buyer
there is a call seller; for every put buyer,
a put seller. The buyer of the option, unlike
the buyer of a futures contract, need not
worry about margin calls. However, the seller
of the option is generally required to post
margin.
If an option position is covered,
the seller holds an offsetting position
in the underlying commodity itself or a
futures contract. For example, the seller
of a Treasury bond call option would be
covered if he actually owned cash market
U.S. Treasury bonds or was long the Treasury
bond futures contract.
If the writer did not hold either, he would
have an uncovered or "naked" position.
In such instances, margin would be required
because the seller would be obligated to
fulfill terms of the option contract in
the event the contract is exercised by the
buyer. It is imperative, therefore, that
the seller demonstrate the ability to meet
any potential contractual obligations beforehand.
In addition, the seller of uncovered options
on interest rate futures assumes the potential
for significant losses.
Motives
for Buying and Selling Options
One may be a buyer or seller of call or
put options for a variety of reasons.
A call option buyer, for example,
is bullish. That is, he or she believes
the price of the underlying futures contract
will rise. If prices do rise, the call option
buyer has three courses of action available.
The first is to exercise the option and
acquire the underlying futures contract
at the strike price. The second is to offset
the long call position with a sale and realize
a profit. The third, and least acceptable,
is to let the option expire worthless and
forfeit the unrealized profit.
The seller of the call option expects
futures prices to remain relatively stable
or to decline modestly. If prices remain
stable, the receipt of the option premium
enhances the rate of return on a covered
position. If prices decline, selling the
call against a long futures position enables
the writer to use the premium as a cushion
to provide downside protection to the extent
of the premium received. For instance, if
T-bond futures were purchased at 80-00 and
a call option with an 80 strike price was
sold for 2-00, T-bond futures could decline
to the 78-00 level before there would be
a net loss in the position (excluding, of
course, margin and commission requirements).
However, should T-bond futures rise to 82-00,
the call option seller forfeits the opportunity
for profit because the buyer would likely
exercise the call against him and acquire
a futures position at 80-00 (the strike
price).
The perspectives of the put buyer and put
seller are completely different. The buyer
of the put option believes prices for the
underlying futures contract will decline.
For example, if a T-bond put option with
a strike price of 82 is purchased for 2-00,
while T-bond futures also are at 82-00,
the put option will be profitable for the
purchaser to exercise if T-bond futures
decline below 80-00.
In many instances, puts will be purchased
in conjunction with a long cash or long
T-bond futures position for "insurance"
purposes. For instance, if an institution
is long T-bond futures at 82-00 and a T-bond
put option with an 82 strike is purchased
for 2-00, the futures contract could, theoretically,
fall to zero and the put option holder could
exercise the option for the 82 strike price,
assuming the option had not yet expired.
The seller of put options on fixed-income
securities believes interest rates will
stay at present levels or decline. In selling
the put option, the writer, of course, receives
income. However, if interest rates rise,
the buyer of the put option can require
the writer to take delivery of the underlying
instrument at a price greater than that
in the new market environment.
Since an option is a wasting asset, an open
position must be closed or exercised, otherwise
the option expires worthless. The chart
below illustrates what happens to the buyer
and the seller after an option is exercised.
Futures
Positions After Option Exercise
Call option Put option
Buyer assumes Long T-bond/note Short T-bond/note
futures position futures position
Seller assumes Short T-bond/note Long T-bond/note
futures position futures position
Option
Premium Valuation
The price (value) of an option premium is
determined competitively by open outcry
auction on the trading floor of the CBOT.
The premium is affected by the influx of
buy and sell orders reaching the exchange
floor. An option buyer pays the premium
in cash to the option seller. This cash
payment is credited to the seller's account.
Prices for T-bond and T-note futures contracts
are quoted differently from the options
premiums on these futures. Options on these
contracts are quoted in 64th of a point.
Therefore, a quote of -01 in options means
1/64, in futures, 1/32.
The option premium has two components: "intrinsic
value" and "time value." The intrinsic
value is the gross profit that would
be realized upon immediate exercise of the
option. In other words, intrinsic value
is the amount by which the portion is in-the-money.
(An option that is out-of-the- money or
at-the-money has no intrinsic value.)
For example, in December, a June Treasury
bond futures contract is priced at 82-00,
while the June 80 call is priced at 3 10/64.
The intrinsic value of the option is 2-00:
Bond futures 82-00
Option strike price 80-00
Intrinsic value 2-00
Time value reflects the probability
the option will gain in intrinsic value
or become profitable to exercise before
it expires.
Time value is determined by subtracting
intrinsic value from the option premium:
Time value = Option premium - Intrinsic value
= 3 10/64 - 2-00
= 1 10/64
Several other factors also have an impact
on the premium. One is the relationship
between the underlying futures price and
strike price. The more an option is in-the-money,
the more it is worth. A second factor is
volatility. Volatile prices of the underlying
commodity can stimulate option demand, enhancing
the premium. The greater the volatility,
the greater the chance the option premium
will increase in value and the option will
be exercised; thus, buyers pay more while
writers demand higher premiums.
A third factor affecting the premium is
time until expiration. Since the underlying
value of the futures contract changes more
within a longer time period, option premiums
are subject to greater fluctuation.
Some parallels can be drawn between the
time value component of an option premium
and the premium charged for an automobile
insurance policy. The longer the term of
the policy, the greater the probability
a claim will be made by the policyholder.
This, of course, presents a greater risk
to the insurance company. To compensate
for this increased risk, the insurer charges
a greater premium. For example, the total
dollar cost of a one-year policy to insure
the vehicle will be greater than a six-month
policy since the vehicle is being insured
for twice as long. The same is true with
options on interest rate futures-the longer
the term until expiration, and the more
volatile the underlying market, the greater
the option premium.
Source:
National Futures Association
|